Update – Judge Dismisses FCRA Class Action Lawsuit
A lawsuit that claimed messy background check paperwork distributed by Kohl’s Department Stores Inc. violated Federal law, has been tossed out by a California judge. The ruling comes fairly swiftly on the heels of the initial court appearance, which we wrote about here on ActiveCare.
The judge dismissed the case after finding the employees who filed the lawsuit failed to demonstrate any “willful” violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act by Kohl’s.
Plaintiffs accused Kohl’s of bundling credit report disclosure forms with other paperwork. This Law360 article says, “Plaintiffs’ attorneys quoted from the FCRA, which says that job applicants must be notified in writing in a “separate, clear and conspicuous document” that the employer may obtain a credit report. Because the Kohl’s notification was combined with other materials, it wasn’t separate, clear and conspicuous, attorney Shaun Setareh of Setareh Law Group said.”
The judge, however, decided the two forms in question were separate documents based on the following evidence:
- Each form has a separate signature by both plaintiffs.
- The job application form is formatted differently, has a different title, and clearly serves a distinct function.
- There is no previous case law stating the documents could not be presented together
Although the Consent and Disclosure form did contain other information, the judge ruled it was relevant to consent and disclosure and therefore wasn’t considered extraneous (which would have made it illegal).
Why Do These Lawsuits Keep Popping Up?
The FCRA lawsuits are popping up because the plaintiffs’ bar has realized that the background check industry is full of employers who are out of compliance on the consent form and adverse action. It’s very low hanging fruit. The EEOC can’t enforce or fine based on the FCRA. Only the Federal Trade Commission, Consumer Finance Protection Bureau and courts can rule and enforce the FCRA.
The EEOC has also made major headlines in the screening, human resources and employment law industries after launching its 2012 Guidance. The idea behind the Guidance (which the EEOC created in conjunction with the Federal Trade Commission) was to simplify the standards and procedures that businesses must follow if they use background checks to vet candidates. The two agencies even created two documents that spell out exactly what’s ok and what’s not ok when it comes to understanding and abiding background screening regulations.
The problem that is arising from this Guidance is that the EEOC is taking a heavy-handed approach to enforcing its rules. The agency is even being accused, in court no less, of overstepping its boundaries with the amount of class action lawsuits that it has filed in recent years. The list of businesses who have come under attack contains big names, too:
• Whole Foods
• Dollar General
Obviously, this is causing a lot of tension, fear, and confusion for businesses, especially those small enough to not employ a full-time human resources professional or have an employment attorney on retainer.
“First and foremost, it is important to remember that the EEOC’s Guidance is not law as the EEOC does not possess legislative authority. Further, the EEOC has repeatedly claimed that this Guidance does not represent a major shift in how the agency viewed employer’s use of criminal information. However, in practice, the EEOC has become more aggressive in pursuing investigations.”
How Active Screening Can Help
We have compiled a compliance checklist for employers to use as a reference.
1 Have an updated copy of the FCRA to reference.
2 Know the definitions the FCRA uses.
3 Provide potential employees with a clear disclosure.
4 Identify self and purpose for screening.
5 Make sure you have written consent from applicant.
6 Do not use alternative methods for screening, i.e. Google or social media.
7 Follow procedures to ensure report accuracy.
8 Re-verify results.
9 Perform an individual assessment before making a hiring decision
Employers taking adverse action must:
1 Provide oral, written or electronic notice to applicant about the Credit Reporting Agency.
2 Must include: name, address and number of the CRA that furnished the report.
3 Must also include: A statement that CRA had no influence on adverse action.
4 Provide notice that applicant may obtain report and dispute accuracy of report.
You can always call one of our team members if you have any questions. Reach us at 1-800-319-5580.
This entry was posted in Applicant-Entry Solutions, Background Screening, General, Human Resources, Industry Solutions, News and tagged Applicant Experience, background checks, Background Screening, Candidate Experience, compliance, Consumer Reporting Agency, CRA, EEOC, FCRA, Federal Law, Hiring, laws, Lawsuit by Patricia Carlson. Bookmark the permalink.
What are you looking for?
- Applicant-Entry Solutions (71)
- Background Screening (237)
- Clinical Services (34)
- Criminal Records (113)
- DOT Employers Clinical Services (14)
- Driver’s Records (29)
- Electronic I-9 Solutions (12)
- General (280)
- Global Solutions (29)
- Human Resources (183)
- Identity & Credit (69)
- Industry Solutions (145)
- News (187)
- References & Credentialing (113)
- Seasonal (29)
- Tenant Screening (7)
- July 2016 (4)
- June 2016 (1)
- April 2016 (2)
- March 2016 (4)
- February 2016 (1)
- January 2016 (7)
- December 2015 (8)
- November 2015 (8)
- October 2015 (7)
- September 2015 (8)
- August 2015 (10)
- July 2015 (6)
- June 2015 (8)
- May 2015 (9)
- April 2015 (9)
- March 2015 (8)
- February 2015 (8)
- January 2015 (7)
- December 2014 (10)
- November 2014 (11)
- October 2014 (14)
- September 2014 (13)
- August 2014 (13)
- July 2014 (5)
- June 2014 (6)
- May 2014 (18)
- April 2014 (25)
- March 2014 (22)
- February 2014 (19)
- January 2014 (12)
- December 2013 (9)
- November 2013 (6)
- October 2013 (3)